Criteria to Be Considered the Greatest Golfer Ever
There will always be a debate on who is the greatest golfer ever. But how do we define who is the greatest ever. Below is a list of possible criteria to evaluate PGA professionals to determine who the greatest golfer of all time is.
Most Major Wins – The most commonly used criteria is the number of major wins. Using this Jack Nicklaus is the greatest golfer of all-time, for now. No one knows what the future holds for Tiger Woods who is only 4 wins behind. But what if we add the element of length of career to the equation. Jack won his 18 majors in 25 years. Tiger has won his 14 in 16 years and counting. What about Bobby Jones who played part time for 8 years and won 7 majors before retiring. The argument goes on and on…
Most Tournaments Won – Certainly an argument can be made that the player who won the most tournaments should be considered the greatest. Sam Snead leads the list with 82 wins (Including 7 majors). One element of greatness is longevity and this is the best measure of quality of career or is it?
Best Scoring Average – Using this would take the entire human element out of the decision of who is the greatest. But it does not include the variables of improvement in equipment, quality of tournaments played or depth of players in the era. There is the long standing argument that Tiger has not had the quality of competition that Jack did (Arnold Palmer, Gary Player, Lee Trevino, Johnny Miller, Tom Watson etc. all played against Jack). The Vardon Trophy is given to the best golfer each year based on scores. Tiger has won it eight times. Next is Billy Casper with five wins. Billy Casper does not even belong in this conversation.
Most Prize Money – Golfers between periods cannot be compared, and recently earnings have skyrocketed. Earning are not a valid criteria.
We would love to hear from our readers on what they think is the most valid criteria to use to name the greatest player ever.
As always, keep ‘em in the fairway.



